Connect with us

Science & Environment

Hinkley Point’s Cardiff Bay toxic mud claim ‘alarmist’

300,000 tonnes of mud from Hinkley Point C is due to be dumped in the sea off Cardiff Bay.



Claims that 300,000 tonnes of mud due to be dumped off Cardiff Bay is toxic are “wrong, alarmist and go against all internationally-accepted scientific evidence”.

Controversial plans to dispose of mud from the Hinkley Point C nuclear project are being scrutinised by members of the Welsh assembly.

Campaigners want further testing.

But the company behind the project said the mud had been tested “independently to highly conservative standards”.

The disposal is needed as part of EDF’s £19.6bn Hinkley C power plant building project.

Chris Fayers, EDF’s head of environment, said the standards employed were supported by Natural Resouces Wales (NRW), Public Health Wales, the Environment Agency, UK Government and the United Nations.

The mud was “not radioactive” and posed no threat to human health or the environment, he told an assembly committee.

A petition calling for a suspension of the marine licence issued by the Welsh Government in 2013 has received 7,171 signatures.

Meanwhile, another petition by Greenpeace to EDF has been signed by more than 87,000 people.

An open letter has also been presented to Energy Secretary Lesley Griffiths on behalf of a coalition of 10 international ocean conservation charities.

Campaigners fear the mud could have become contaminated by discharges from Hinkley and want a more detailed investigation of samples.

No environmental impact assessment was carried out before permission to dump the sediment at a disposal site, known as Cardiff Grounds, was granted.

It is located just over a mile out to sea from Cardiff Bay.

The Welsh Government insisted it was assessed in line with legal requirements.

Testing on the sediment was carried out by CEFAS, an executive agency of the UK Government, and has since been analysed by NRW.

It found levels of artificial radioactivity in the mud were so low they would equate to being “not radioactive” in law.

A presentation prepared for AMs by EDF outlined a case involving this methodology:

The research found combining natural and artificial levels of radioactivity together, any exposure would be 10,000 times less than an airline pilot’s annual dose, 750 times less than the average dose received by a resident of Pembrokeshire due to naturally occurring Radon, and equivalent to eating 20 bananas each year – an “infinitesimally small level”.

Media playback is unsupported on your device Media captionDr David Richards said radioactivity levels he tested in the Severn Estuary were negligible

Dr David Richards, a reader in physical geography at the University of Bristol has also carried out research on levels of radioactivity in the Severn Estuary.

His samples were taken from salt marshes near the coast at Portishead and Sand Bay. He told BBC Wales the levels of radioactivity he detected were in the “same order of magnitude” as those identified at Hinkley Point.

“At all times it is low, barely above background radiation,” he said.

“There’s a large amount of sediment involved here, but if you total the amount of radioactivity it is still quite small.”

Dr Richards said more needed to be done to improve the public’s understanding about radioactivity and what constituted an acceptable dose.

He added: “Most of the radiation that humans receive comes from natural sources that you cannot avoid, or they might be coming from medical sources or transatlantic flights.

“The levels of extra dose that we would be getting from these sediments is minimal, negligible.”

@media only screen and (min-width: 1px) { .ns_datapic_stat–hinkley1 .ns_outer_wrapper { background-image: none; } .ns_datapic_stat–hinkley1 .ns_outer_wrapper .ns_inner_wrapper { max-width: 100%; padding: 0; } } @media only screen and (min-width: 480px) { .ns_datapic_stat–hinkley1 .ns_outer_wrapper .ns_inner_wrapper { max-width: 40%; padding: 0.5em; } .ns_datapic_stat–hinkley1 .ns_outer_wrapper { background-image: url(; } } .ie8 .ns_datapic_stat–hinkley1 .ns_outer_wrapper .ns_inner_wrapper { max-width: 40%; padding: 0.5em; } .ie8 .ns_datapic_stat–hinkley1 .ns_outer_wrapper { background-image: url(; }

Hinkley Point C

Nuclear power station, Somerset


building cost

  • 25,000 jobs

  • 60 year lifespan

  • 7% of UK’s generation needs

  • £92 per MWh electricity price agreed with UK Government

EDF Energy

The results of the most recent testing, carried out in May 2017, are due to be presented to the NRW by the end of the week.

The assembly’s petitions committee also heard from campaigners against their plans.

Media playback is unsupported on your device Media captionChris Fayers of EDF and campaigner Tim Deere-Jones, a marine pollution consultant, both gave evidence

Tim Deere-Jones, a marine pollution consultant, who has spearheaded the campaign against the dumping told AMs “we should be extremely cautious of how we dispose of this sediment.”

The area where the dredging is due to take place has been in receipt of over half a century’s worth of discharges of low-level waste from the former Hinkley Point A and B.

He said the ability of radioactivity to be transferred from sea to land had been well documented and it would be “much better to not run the risk” of moving the mud.

“Don’t put it into somebody’s inshore waters – we know that inshore waters interact with coastal zones. Leave it where it is.”

The petitions committee has already indicated a full debate on the issue may be required in the New Year.

Meanwhile, the chairman of the assembly’s environment committee has called for a third party to test samples of the sediment before it is moved.

Writing to NRW, Mike Hedges AM said if concerns around the dumping prove to be unfounded, “a considerable amount of work is needed to translate that message to the public, both locally and more widely”.

View comments

Science & Environment

RemoveDebris: Space junk mission prepares for launch

A spacecraft that will test the best methods to clean up space debris is nearing completion.




A mission that will test different methods to clean up space junk is getting ready for launch.

The RemoveDebris spacecraft will attempt to snare a small satellite with a net and test whether a harpoon is an effective garbage grabber.

The probe has been assembled in Surrey and will soon be packed up ready for blast off early next year.

Scientists warn that the growing problem of space debris is putting spacecraft and astronauts at risk.

It is estimated that there are about half a million pieces of man-made rubbish orbiting the Earth, ranging from huge defunct satellites, to spent rocket boosters and nuts and bolts.

Any collisions can cause a great deal of damage, and generate even more pieces of debris.

The RemoveDebris mission is led by the Surrey Space Centre at the University of Surrey.

The assembly of the spacecraft, which is about the size of a washing machine, has taken place at Surrey Satellite Technology Ltd (SSTL) and is almost complete.

Dr Jason Forshaw, project manager on the RemoveDebris team, said: “RemoveDebris will be one of the world’s first missions in this area…. We have technologies on here that have never been demonstrated in space before.”

Image copyright Max Alexander Image caption The spacecraft has been assembled in the UK and will soon be packed up for launch

The spacecraft will first head for the International Space Station on a resupply rocket.

It will then be unpacked by astronauts before being launched from the orbiter to begin its experiments.

RemoveDebris has its own space junk on board – small satellites. It will release one of these into space and then will use a net to recapture it.

It will also fire a small harpoon at a target plate to see if the technology can accurately work in the weightless environment.

It will finally test future de-orbiting technology. As the orbiter descends to Earth it will deploy a 10sq m sail, which will change the spacecraft’s speed and ensure it burns up as it enters the atmosphere.

“It will prevent the spacecraft from becoming space junk itself,” explained Dr Forshaw.

The hope is that the technology-testing mission, which has cost £15m, will lead to larger clean-up efforts.

“People are starting to realise the significance of space junk and the problem it presents,” Dr Forshaw said.

Image copyright RemoveDebris Mission Image caption The spacecraft will establish whether a net could ensnare a small satellite

Scientists estimate that there are about 7,500 tonnes of rubbish in space and we are reaching a critical point. .

Dr Hugh Lewis, senior lecturer in aerospace engineering at the University of Southampton, said: “For some people, space debris is one of these things that is out of sight, out of mind.

“But from my perspective it is one of the worst environmental catastrophes that we have encountered.”

Even very small pieces of junk can do a great deal of damage.

Last year a loose fleck of paint is thought to have caused a crack in a window on the International Space Station.

Image copyright ESA Image caption Last year a small piece of debris chipped a window on the International Space Station

The largest pieces, though, present a pressing problem.

In 2012, a European satellite called Envisat, the size of a double decker bus, suddenly stopped working.

Since then it’s been circling the Earth, threatening other key satellites in its path.

Dr Lewis explained: “The biggest pieces of space debris have huge amounts of mass in them. If they were to be hit by something, they would release all that mass in the form of thousands and thousands of more fragments.”

More debris, could lead to more collisions – a cascade effect known as the Kessler syndrome. The fear is that space could eventually become inoperable.

“The environment provides us with really important services – like navigation, timing, communications, weather forecasting and so on,” Dr Lewis added.

“The worst case scenario is probably the loss of some vital satellites… it would mean stepping back probably decades in terms of our technology we take for granted on Earth.”

Image copyright Hugh Lewis Image caption It is estimated that there are about half a million pieces of space junk the size of a marble or larger

The European Space Agency is now looking at how larger satellites like Envisat can be destroyed – but cleaning up space piece by piece will be difficult and extremely expensive.

International space guidelines suggest that satellites should de-orbit themselves after 25 years – but it is difficult to ensure everyone plays by the rules.

Some experts are also concerned that the new push to launch small satellites (known as cubesats) in increasingly large numbers could add to the problem.

Martin Pointer from SSTL said: ” Space junk is definitely a concern for us. As more and more satellites are put up – especially some of the constellations of small satellites – the likelihood of collisions is much greater.

“I think it’s our responsibility to ensure we don’t cause more junk in space and find ways of either removing those at the end of life or for mitigating against problems.”

Follow Rebecca on Twitter.

Continue Reading

Science & Environment

River departed ‘before Indus civilisation emergence’

One of the world’s earliest urban civilisations thrived in the absence of a big Himalayan river, a new study finds.




Further light has been shed on the emergence and demise of one of the earliest urban civilisations.

The Indus society came to prominence in what is now northwest India and Pakistan some 5,300 years ago thanks in large part to the sustenance of a long-lost Himalayan river.

Or so it was thought.

New evidence now indicates this great water course had actually changed its path and disappeared before the Indus people had even settled in the region.

That they lacked the resource offered by a big, actively flowing river will come as a surprise to many; the other early urban societies of the time, in Egypt and Mesopotamia, certainly benefitted in this way.

The new research was led from the Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur and from Imperial College London.

Image copyright NASA/USGS Image caption Infrared satellite imagery picks out the distinctive sediments of the ancient channel Image copyright S.Gupta Image caption Remnant of a street in the urban centre of Kalibangan

The group’s scientists do not disagree that the Bronze Age settlements would have needed a good water supply, but argue that this requirement could have been met instead by seasonal monsoon rains that still collected and ran through the valley abandoned by the old river.

“Our paper clearly demolishes the age-old river-culture hypothesis that assumed that the disappearance of the river triggered the demise of the Harappan civilisation,” said IITK’s Prof Rajiv Sinha.

“We have argued that while large rivers have important connections with ancient societies, it is their departure that controls their stabilisation rather than their arrival.

“This has clearly been demonstrated by the large difference in age data between the demise of the river (8,000-12,000 years ago) and the peak of mature civilisation (3,000-4,000 years ago),” he told BBC News.

Prof Sinha and colleagues report their findings in this week’s Nature Communications journal.

Image copyright A.Carter/Birkbeck, University of London Image caption A collection of mineral grains that helped trace the origin of the palaeo-river

They have examined afresh the course of what is referred to as the Ghaggar-Hakra palaeo-channel, from satellite data and from field investigations.

Much of the archaeology of Indus cities, such as Kalibangan and Banawali, is scattered along this old river course.

The team shows the relict valley to be the former trace of today’s big Sutlej River, which must have abruptly changed course – as many Himalayan rivers are prone to do.

“They tend to switch on 100-year timescales,” explained Prof Sanjeev Gupta from Imperial College.

“But because the Sutlej became incised in its new course, it never switched back and that left the paleo-channel protected. That allowed, I believe, the Indus communities to flourish because they were saved from devastating floods.

“Some of their sites were actually built in the palaeo-channel itself and that makes no sense if there was a big raging Himalayan river there at the time because these people would have been wiped out.”

Image copyright S.Gupta Image caption Broken pieces of Indus pottery exposed at the surface at Kalibangan

Dating of the sediments in the palaeo-channel was done using a technique known as optically stimulated luminescence.

It reveals that the initial abandonment of the valley by the Sutlej River commenced after about 15,000 years ago, with complete “avulsion” to its present course shortly after 8,000 years ago.

Prof Gupta said the Indus people were competent engineers and so would have been able to manage their water needs, potentially even accessing underground supplies. But precisely how they operated in these circumstances of reduced water possibilities was now really a question for the archaeologists to answer, he added.

“What is clear though is that this culture had a diverse landscape and they were able to adapt to it,” he told BBC News.

Prof Rita Wright is an anthropologist at New York University and unconnected to the new research.

She said it represented a “major building block” in our understanding but stressed also that it concerned just a part of the region occupied by Harappan society.

“It is focused primarily on a single area in northwest India, [but] enormously important.

“In contrast to the Indus Valley, it presents (and provides evidence for) a very different water ecology. No denying that water was one of the major resources in the Indus, so here we have evidence for significant differences between the Indus valley alluvial plain and the Ghaggar monsoon-driven water system.”

Image copyright NASA/USGS Image caption Indus civilisation urban settlements were spread across what is now NW India and Pakistan Image copyright Spl Image caption The Harappan site at Mohenjo-daro, Pakistan. It was built on the banks of the Indus River

Prof Gupta has written a longer account of the research which can be read here. and follow me on Twitter: @BBCAmos

Continue Reading

Science & Environment

Trophy hunting removes ‘good genes’ and raises extinction risk

Hunting animals with the biggest horns, tusks or manes could lead to extinction, according to a study.




Hunting animals that stand out from the crowd because of their impressive horns or lustrous manes could lead to extinction, according to a study.

Research predicts that removing even 5% of high-quality males risks wiping out the entire population, for species under stress in a changing world.

Animals prized by trophy hunters for their horns, antlers or tusks usually have the best genes, say UK scientists.

Removing these could push a species over the edge, they warn.

There is intense global debate over trophy hunting. Some argue that it should be banned or restricted, while others say it can provide valuable revenue for conservation.

Dr Rob Knell of Queen Mary, University of London, who led the research, said the assumption that so-called selective harvesting is not especially threatening to a population of animals does not take into account recent work.

”Because these high-quality males with large secondary sexual traits tend to father a high proportion of the offspring, their ‘good genes’ can spread rapidly, so populations of strongly sexually selected animals can adapt quickly to new environments,” he said.

”Removing these males reverses this effect and could have serious and unintended consequences.”

Human hunting is different from natural predation in that big-game trophy hunters target large animals, usually males.

They may be awarded prizes for killing animals with exceptionally large antlers, horns or manes.

And illegal poaching of animals such as elephants for the ivory trade also targets animals with the biggest tusks.

Using a computer simulation model, the scientists were able to predict the impact of selectively targeting males on the basis of their secondary sexual traits.

”If the population is having to adapt to a new environment and you remove even a small proportion of these high quality males, you could drive it to extinction,” said Dr Knell.

”You’re removing the genes from the population that would otherwise allow the population to adapt.”

In the past, human hunting has led to the extinction of many animals, from the zebra-like Quagga, which was once common in Southern Africa, to the Tasmanian tiger of mainland Australia and Tasmania.

Hunting is still legal in many countries; trophy hunting takes place over a larger area in Sub-Saharan Africa than is conserved in national parks.

In the US and Canada, there is also a lucrative trophy hunting industry, for the likes of deer and big-horn sheep.

Some argue that revenue from trophy hunting can support conservation efforts and local livelihoods.

The scientists said age restrictions that allow males to breed before being removed could reduce the impact of trophy hunting.

This is already recommended with some species, such as lions.

“When properly regulated trophy hunting can be a powerful force for conservation which is why we’re suggesting a different management approach as opposed to calling for a ban,” said Dr Knell.

The study is published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

Follow Helen on Twitter.

View comments

Continue Reading


Sports5 hours ago

Pornhub star Mia Khalifa slammed for attacking WWE by stunning wrestler Eva Marie

PORN star Mia Khalifa has been taken down a peg by WWE women’s division hero Eva Marie after the porn...

Sports5 hours ago

Marko Arnautovic in row with former boss Mark Hughes after winding up Stoke fans during 3-0 West Ham win

DAVID MOYES was annoyed with Marko Arnautovic – but not half as much as Mark Hughes must have been. Former Stoke...

Sports5 hours ago

Antoine Griezmann edges closer to stunning Barcelona transfer as Catalan club’s president meets with his family in bitter blow to Manchester United’s hopes of landing striker

ANTOINE GRIEZMANN has moved a step closer to sealing a stunning transfer to Barcelona after the Catalan club’s president reportedly...

Sports5 hours ago

Billy Joe Saunders calls out Gennady Golovkin after stunning win over David Lemieux in Canada on Saturday

BILLY JOE SAUNDERS called out Gennady Golovkin after his stunning win over David Lemieux in Canada on Saturday night. The...

Sports5 hours ago

Tyson Fury brands heavyweight champion Anthony Joshua a ‘carthorse’ who can’t box

TYSON FURY has branded Anthony Joshua a “carthorse” and claims the heavyweight champion can’t box. The Gypsy King, 29, is hoping...

Sports5 hours ago

West Ham news: Slaven Bilic hits back at Hammers owner David Sullivan over claims he made all the flop signings

SLAVEN BILIC has hit back at West Ham chairman David Sullivan’s claims that the Croatian was responsible for poor signings....

Sports5 hours ago

Chris Froome: Former cycling chief Brian Cookson admits he knew about failed test when he backed Team Sky

EX-WORLD cycling chief Brian Cookson admitted he DID know Chris Froome had failed a drugs test when he called for...

Sports5 hours ago

West Brom vs Man Utd LIVE SCORE: Latest updates from Premier League clash

MANCHESTER UNITED visit West Brom as they aim to keep their faint title hopes alive. The Red Devils are in...

Sports5 hours ago

Sparta Rotterdam 0 Feyenoord 7 LIVE SCORE: Dutch champions making statement with thrashing away to local rivals

Feyenoord travel to the Generali Arena unbeaten in five games and a win could see them move  up to fifth in...

Sports5 hours ago

Verona vs AC Milan: Live stream, TV channel, kick-off time and team news for the Serie A clash

AC MILAN are preparing to face Hellas Verona for the second time in a week. The Rossoneri will be brimming...